An Introduction to French
Opening Strategy
By Richard Hucknall
No doubt
I am an exception, but France is the country I like playing least of all. L
don’t know why this should be so, as it has a good track record for postal
wins and has the best record for draws. However when I see the French opening
set up it fails to fire me with the interest that both Austria and Russia seem
to generate.
The big
advantage for France is the proximity of three neutral supply centres; two of
them (Por and Spa) usually there for the taking in Autumn 1901. Thus it is no
surprise that most Frances have 5 centres at the end of the first year. The
‘cushion of Iberia’ was how Nicky Palmer described it in his article ‘The
Northern Dash’ although this article was based on the idea that France can
afford to ignore Spa and Por in 1901 and pick them up again at his leisure. The
two centres can be taken in a variety of non-aggressive ways but should England,
Germany or Italy attack in the opening year then France can defend fairly well
but will have to be content with one gain from Iberia. An attack by two or more
of these countries is usually disastrous and France is left to play a rearguard
action.
The major
diplomatic effort at the gamestart is usually to forge an alliance with either
England or Germany against the other. Better still ally with both and play them
off against each other —the talent of a top player. Personally, I prefer the
German alliance as the sight of numerous English fleets to the north always
makes me nervous. Should England be eliminated then France and Germany have
separate areas for expansion without having to come to blows, but an
Anglo-French alliance eliminating Germany means France must attack Italy next
(difficult) or stab his former English ally. If he goes against Italy then the
English may land fleets in Brest and armies in France.
As
discussed in other articles, Belgium is the major 1901 focal point and France
has a very big say in who finally takes this centre. This can help him dictate
the pattern of play in the early game. The most sensitive areas for France are
ENG, Bur and Pie. Germany has no reason to go for Bur unless he supports an
attack on France or wants to attack France himself. Should he be adamant that he
should take Bel the he can go to Hol and Ruh, giving a good chance for Bel in
the autumn without threatening French centres. However, a pre-arranged stand off
in Bur can be a good thing. Germany is often happy to keep A(Mun) where it is in
case Austria, Russia or Italy move against him and this can be arranged by a Bur
stand off. France has the choice of A(Par) or A(Mar) to bounce the German A(Mun)
back. I prefer A(Mar) as then in the Autumn it can be used to defend against an
Italian attack or take Spain. I believe this stand of f can go a long way to
cementing a French/German alliance.
A move to
ENG by either England or France can be construed as aggressive unless you have
sufficient diplomatic skills to persuade your neighbour otherwise, but unlike
the Bur stand off, there seems to be little point in arranging a stand off in
ENG as fleets in Bre and Lon will be of little use for Autumn 1901 moves and may
just result in another stand off with vital supply centres blocked for builds.
Piedmont
is perhaps the most interesting of the three. Although it is only of minor
importance in 1901 it often becomes vital in the middle and end game, being the
only land province between the Med and the Alps. Normally, it can be neutralised
in 1901 as France is more concerned with Germany and England whilst Italy is
concerned with Austria, Turkey and Russia and his southern expansion. From the
French point of view, Mar can still be defended quite comfortably even if Italy
has moved to Pie in Spring 1901, although it may mean a delay in taking one of
the Iberian centres. A useful ploy in this situation is to tell Italy that you
will defend Mar from his A(Pie) (assuming Mar is vacant) by a stand off and will
then build F(Mar). This can be a sufficient deterrent to send A(Pie) back where
it came from although your A(Mar) will also be back where it started. Pie has
another peculiarity in that there is only one exit on the French side but three
on the Italian side. A French army in Pie can be pushed into Tyr, yen or Tus.
This can be a back-door attack on Germany but requires trust and. secrecy on
Italy’s part and cannot come to fruition until 1902. The advantage is that it
can be easy to convince Germany that your A(Pie) is Italy bound.
Generally,
most games begin with non-aggression pacts between France and Italy.
Occasionally one sees attacks in 1901 but usually they agree to keep GOL, WMS,
NAf and Pie vacant and there are strict agreements about fleets in TYS and
Spa.sc. A common request is that France does not build F(Mar). I often smile at
this as a F(Bre) can move to WMS just as quickly as a F(Mar) could. If you build
in Bre to lull the Italian into a false sense of security, then move to MAO
(promising an attack on IRI) the fleet can be thrust into WMS with a build of
F(Mar) to complement it. Then Italy is in trouble!
|