Table of Contents
Broadcast message from [jorge@phyast.pitt.edu as] France in 'backseat':
Thanks to everyone, players, advisors and Master for a great game.
Jorge Llambias
<jorge@phyast.pitt.edu>
France in "backseat"
Broadcast message from [albertm@scotty.hfl.tc.faa.gov as] Russia in 'backseat':
End of Game Statement for Russia in game Backseat
By Czar Albert Macias
albertm@hfl.tc.faa.gov
Ladies, Gentlemen and fellow Diplomacy players.
It has the advantage of having never been tried.
And the golden forked tongue award goes to...
To live and die in Constantinople.
Nothing is more boring than not having an enemy to fight.
The long days journey into night.
If it is not baroque, don't fix it.
And now for something completely different...
What kind of drugs is the Czar taking?
And the number one reason for killing Italy.
All the hail the Toad Father!!!
The difference between cutthroat and carebear is the risk you are willing to take based on the probability of a solo win. Everyone has a different definition of cutthroat and carebear. Everyone also has a different idea of what is acceptable play. Most of these definitions fall under the Supreme Court's "I can't define it, but I know it when I see it" ruling. Please feel free to label me under any style you wish to define, but be advised that next game I will not be playing that style. I would also encourage everyone to read Dan Shoham's excellent article in the first issue of The Diplomatic Pouch called "The Diplomacy Academy".
Thank you, Lansdowne, Mazarin, Picard, Richelieu, Jurgen Pohl and anyone else I forgot. A special thank you to Waid Here for great chatter. I hope my style of play did not cause you too much discomfort.
Parting shot at the purists...
Besides, I did come in second. ;-)
Broadcast message from [jorge@phyast.pitt.edu as] France in 'backseat':
The Czar, after a loooooooong excuse for not doing what he should have done, said:
> Besides, I did come in second. ;-)
Yes, a shared second with Italy and France... :)
Broadcast message from [townsena@essex.hsc.colorado.edu as] Germany in 'backseat':
Broadcast message from [myers@mer.seaoar.uvic.ca as] Italy in 'backseat':
EOG Statement from Italy in Backseat
Paul Myers
myers@ocean.seaoar.uvic.ca
From then on, things were downhill until Germany went on to victory.
Two more comments I would like to make:
Broadcast message from [albertm@scotty.hfl.tc.faa.gov as] Russia in 'backseat':
Greetings again from the frozen tundra of Moscow.
Broadcast message from [jorge@phyast.pitt.edu as] France in 'backseat':
Anyway, responding to your comments:
I certainly noticed, and was very glad.
> All the various advisors accused me of attacking France, etc.
> 1) Why does everyone think I allowed Germany easily into
> the Med.
Broadcast message from [dagenais@super.wlu.ca as] England in 'backseat':
Thanks to all expecially Simon. This is a great variant.
Rick Dagenais
dagenais@super.wlu.ca
Broadcast message from [simon@diplom.org as] Master in 'backseat':
***EOG for Turkey*****
Turkey is normally a fairly defensible position to play and can be played either conservatively or agressively. In this variant style, the "driver" of the country has very little to say and also has no control over his "backseat advisors". This, of course, makes the game very interesting. In my case, my first advisor was excessively agressive for my style of play. I also felt his comments (WAID Here) to be too strong and could not be backed up by force. I was torn between following this advise or demonstrating that I did not agree with such an agressive stance. Unfortunately for both WAID Here and myself, the advisors of france and italy took on a religious Role-Playing style as Cardinals of the Church. WAID Here's comments started a crusade against turkey with everyone jumping on board.
To me, it is suicide to move against Italy with both russia and austria as unknown forces. So I used my forces to show an agressive stance against russia hoping that either WAID Here would understand his style was too agressive or that austria would join me. Well austria sat in the bush so to speak, but WAID Here did seem to understand and became less agressive. Unfortunately, it was too late for turkey.
I asked for a second advisor as only diplomacy could save turkey now and received General Zarg, a slightly insane dude. After his first message, I saw a chance, then after his insanity appeared, I saw only death. Now I opened myself completely to russia in the hope that at least the spoils would not go to Italy. Russia did not act.
Needless to say, there was not much of a chance.
In hindsight, turkey could only have succeeded if a mechanism existed for the "Driver" and the "Backseat advisor" to talk. For example, at the beginning of each spring move only.
Although I died early, I would play another variant game of this style.
Glenn
Turkey in Backseat